A moral dilemma activates a system that is responsible for a particular value (honor, justice, mutual assistance, and others). Value, in turn, suggests a solution. Reciprocity has to do with the cognitive system of social exchange. Let’s say a forager remembers that he was very helpful to his neighbor last week, and she responds with stinginess. The cognitive system may suggest that he is entitl to more fish than he was given. Another “set of rules” – altruism – says that it is necessary to take care of relatives, even if they do not reciprocate.
To weigh conflicting moral obligations
An the fact that the collector was just unlucky activates Chile Phone Number List the cognitive system that is responsible for risk distribution. In this case, the gatherer will come to the conclusion that he deserves help from fellow fishermen. And make an intuitive decision. The Gatherer is fac with a dilemma: the obligation to help a brother is in conflict with the obligation not to harm a neighbor. His system of moral compromises must find a balance between these obligations and find the most correct solution.
When we think about a problem
For example he decides to steal three fish out of ten – an optimal solution that will ruce (but not minimize) his brother’s recovery time and at the BT Lists same time will not cause significant damage to his neighbors. This judgment will form the basis for the decision. At the same time, it is possible that there may be a temptation to take more fish in order to eat more yourself. How does the moral compromise system work?, one or more social cognitive systems are activat. morally charg view of the situation. If different ideas contradict each other, the system of moral compromises is activat. The system of moral compromises is divid into three subsystems: MV (English moral values.
